Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Baker v. Hannah-Jones
as 25-300
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. BAKER, JR.
Defendant:
NIKOLE HANNAH-JONES, IBRAM X. KENDI, KEISHA BLAIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07723
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reynolds-Hall v. University of South Carolina et al
as 3:2024cv06887
Defendant:
University of South Carolina Police Department, Fifth Circuit Solicitor Office, University of South Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Kamarah Reynolds-Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker Jr. v. Hannah-Jones et al
as 1:2024cv08760
Defendant:
Jelani Cobb, Nikole Hannah-Jones, Vievee Francis and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Baker Jr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
UNCENSORED AMERICA v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
as 3:2024cv05437
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff:
UNCENSORED AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Misanin et al v. Wilson et al
as 2:2024cv04734
Defendant:
William H. Bingham, Sr., South Carolina Public Employee Benefit Authority, Thomas L. Stephenson and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Noe, Grant Goe, Nina Noe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
