Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RAMIREZ v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv02095
Plaintiff:
IVONNE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC. and COMPANY (A THROUGH L) THESE NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
DISH Technologies L.L.C. et al v. Univision Communications Inc.
as 1:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Univision Communications Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sling TV L.L.C. and DISH Technologies L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03717
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Delaware Radio Technologies LLC et al v. Univision Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01826
Plaintiff:
Delaware Radio Technologies LLC and Wyncomm LLC
Defendant:
Univision Communications Inc. and Univision Radio Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc. v. Univision Communications Inc.
as 1:2013cv00435
Plaintiff:
HBAC MatchMaker Media Inc.
Defendant:
Univision Communications Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CUADRA v. UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04946
Plaintiff:
IRIS L. CUADRA
Defendant:
UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC., JOHN DESIMONE and JOHN DOE 1-4 (fictitiuous persons unknown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Prometheus Radio v. FCC
as 03-3388
Not Party - Petitioner:
PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECT
Not Party - Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Intervenor:
FOX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC, FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC, NBC INC and others
Not Party - Proposed Amicus-Appellee:
MICHAEL M. EPSTEIN
Not Party - Proposed Amicu:
NEIL ELLIS, MONTEREY LICENSES and MID WEST MANAGEMENT INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
