Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Perez et al v. Hospital Comunitario Buen Samaritano, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Efrain Perez and Damaris Feliciano Mendez
Defendant:
Hospital Comunitario Buen Samaritano, Inc. or, alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Buen Samaritano, Dr. Edgar A. Pou, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Sanchez Guzman et al v. Hospital Del Maestro, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Glorimar Sanchez Guzman and Luis O. Angulo Roman
Defendant:
Hospital Del Maestro, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital del Maestro, San Claudio Medical or alternatively, Richard Roe Corporation d/b/a San Claudio Medical, Dr. Jorge Valdesuso Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Feliciano-Mendez et al v. Hospital Comunitario Buen Samaritano, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
Damaris Feliciano Mendez, Efrain Perez and Damaris Feliciano-Mendez
Defendant:
Hospital Comunitario Buen Samaritano, Inc., Dr. Edgar A. Pou, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Robles-Figueroa v. Presbyterian Community Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01361
Plaintiff:
Keila Robles Figueroa and Keila Robles-Figueroa
Defendant:
Presbyterian Community Hospital, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation, d/b/a Presbyterian Community Hospital, Dr. Juan C. Castaner Barcel, Mary Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Thillet-Torres v. Dorado Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01313
Plaintiff:
Dianeliz Thillet Torres and Dianeliz Thillet-Torres
Defendant:
Dorado Health, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Manati Medical Center, Dr. Yolisa Suarez Ortiz, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sandoval et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Bernice Sandoval and David Junior Lebron
Defendant:
Mennonite General Hospital, Inc. or alternatively, Richard Roe Corporation d/b/a Mennonite General Hospital, Hospital Oriente, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Hospital Oriente, Dr. Abel Valle Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Torres-Rios et al v. Dorado Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01129
Plaintiff:
DIANA I. TORRES RIOS, C.O.T minor son, CARLOS I. ORTIZ-TORRES and others
Defendant:
DORADO HEALTH, INC., JOHN DOE CORPORATION, MANATI MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Berrios Gonzalez v. Hospital Menonita Guayama, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01069
Plaintiff:
Maria Berrios Gonzalez
Defendant:
Hospital Menonita Guayama, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation, d/b/a Hospital Menonita de Guayama, Dr. Juan D. Ortiz Rivera, Mary Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Burgos-Hernandez, et al. v. Metro Santurce, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
ISUE BURGOS HERNANDEZ, GUARIONEX ALVARADO ADORNO, in representation of their minor sons YEAB, YAAB and YOAB, Isue Burgos-Hernandez and Guarionex Alvarado-Adorno
Defendant:
Metro Santurce, Inc., Maria Casado and her husband JOHN DOE, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership, EDNA FIGUEROA and her husband John Doe 1, each of them personally and in representation of their conjugal partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Rodriguez et al v. Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of San Juan, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01609
Plaintiff:
Norene Rodriguez and Iris Aida Rodriguez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of San Juan, Inc. or alternatively, John Doe Corporation d/b/a Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of San Juan, Dr. Jose A. Baez Cordova, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
