Cases 1 - 10 of 2,074
National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak) v. .028 Acres More or Less of Land et al
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak)
Defendant:
.028 Acres More or Less of Land, Dwight McFadden, Lena McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP v. Isaac et al
as 5:2024cv00380
Defendant:
Phillips Gas Company, Harold Isaac, Karen Isaac and others
Plaintiff:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
The Central Trust Bank v. Edwardsville Health Properties, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
The Central Trust Bank
Defendant:
Edwardsville Health Properties, LLC, Edwardsville Care Center, LLC, University Health Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak) v. .028 Acres More or Less of Land et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak)
Defendant:
.028 Acres More or Less of Land, Dora Taylor, The Estate of Dora Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. 025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2034 West Lanvale Street et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Defendant:
.025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2034 West Lanvale Street, 2008 DRR-ETS LLC, EDWARD F GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 189.9 rods in Twsp. 149, et al
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
189.9 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: W1/2SE1/4 Section 14: NW1/4NE1/4 McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 227.8 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 11: N1/2SW1/4, W1/2SE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across, 242.0 rods, more or less, located in Township 149 North, Range 98 W Section 2: SW1/4SE1/4 Section 11: NE1/4, McKenzie County, North Dakota, An easement and right-of-way across and others
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. v. 3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4 et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
Defendant:
3.02 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: NW/4, 2.92 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: N/2SW/4, 1.45 acres, more or less, located in Township 140 North, Range 50 West Section 33: S/2SW/4 with exception and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2026 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, Maryland 21217 et al
as 1:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation(Amtrak)
Defendant:
.025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 2026 West Lanvale Street in Baltimore City, Maryland 21217, 2009 DRR-ETS LLC, ETS Maryland, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
United States of America v. 0.10 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in the City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Bernice Culmore, Maxwell Culmore, Jr., Joseph Culmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
