Cases 21 - 30 of 13,360
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Parties, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caraffa #350727 v. Noel et al
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
D Noel, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marshall #732012 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall #732012
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janucevic et al v. USAA General Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Carol Janucevic and Paul Janucevic
Defendant:
USAA General Indemnity Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tran v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Them Tran
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
