Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Boxley v. 21st Century Charter School at Gary, Inc., et al.
as 2:2023cv00270
Defendant:
Andre and Aquanita N. Boxley, As Father and Mother and next of kin of A.B., a Minor, 21st Century Charter School @ Gary, Inc., W. Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Boxley and Aquanita N. Boxley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STATE OF INDIANA v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Unknown Owner and Any Heirs, Devisees, Legatees, Successors, Assigns, Executors, Trustees, Receivers, Agents and Representatives and All Other Unknown Persons or Entities Claiming An Interest in the R, INDIANA DELAWARE COUNTY and others
Coleman v. Unknown Persons of the United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Unknown Persons of the United States Marshal Service, Unknown Persons of the Gary, Indiana Police Department and Unknown Persons of the Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearm Agency
Plaintiff:
Victoria Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stewart v. A Unknown Person et al
as 1:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Stewart
Defendant:
A Unknown Person and Westville State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. LYTLE et al
as 1:2016cv00281
Defendant:
CITY OF CARMEL, OFFICER BLAKE LYTLE, CHAPMAN MIKE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WAYNE REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 2:2015cv00359
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. , Walgreens Store 4750 and Unknown Persons/Employees
Plaintiff:
Kira Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. OPEN DOOR FAMILY PLANNING et al
as 1:2011cv01118
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE L. COOPER
Defendant:
JANE OR JOHN DOE, OPEN DOOR FAMILY PLANNING and UNKNOWN PERSONS
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
