Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rettig #307829 v. Tennyson et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Rettig #307829
Defendant:
Unknown Tennyson, Unknown Neun, Unknown Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05504
Defendant:
Unknown Lee, Unknown Alcala, Unknown Spurgin and others
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv01839
Defendant:
Unknown Lee, Unknown Alcala, Unknown Tennyson and others
Plaintiff:
John Leo Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Outley v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02753
Defendant:
Unknown Graffious, Unknown Haley, Unknown Tennyson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Outley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01663
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamont Wilson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edison Peoples v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 16-2096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDISON ALEXANDER PEOPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden and others
Evans v. De La Rosa et al
as 2:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
Ryan Robert Evans
Defendant:
Unknown De La Rosa, Unknown Jenkins, Unknown Tennyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples #479867 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Edison Alexander Peoples #479867
Defendant:
Catherine Bauman, Scott Sprader, Dan Lesatz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Threatt #182625 v. Rose et al
as 2:2012cv00274
Plaintiff:
Anthony Threatt #182625
Defendant:
Senta Rose, Unknown Westcomb, Unknown Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
