Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Morgan v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Roberta Morgan
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Redie Lewis
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hafner v. Hart et al
as 0:2014cv03282
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Hafner
Defendant:
Lawrence Hart and As yet unnamed defendants in their official and individual capacities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
Bernard Ware
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pledge v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joe Pledge, Sr.
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver Family Interests, et al v. Donald Wood
as 12-3024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Oliver Family Interests, LTD and GBS International, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Russell Wright, Michael Bogart, Robert Feeney and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Don Wood
Oliver Family Interests, et al v. Joseph Wright
as 12-3021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Oliver Family Interests, LTD and GBS International, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Russell Wright, Michael Bogart, Robert Feeney and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Joseph P. Wright
Oliver Family Interests, et al v. Russell Wright, et al
as 12-2573
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Oliver Family Interests, LTD and GBS International, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellant:
Russell Wright and Michael Bogart
Defendant:
Robert Feeney, Stoam Holding, LLC, Doris Wright and others
Mack v. Black Hawk County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2011cv02038
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Mack, Jr
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff Department, Black Hawk County Jail and Unnamed Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
