Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Gregory v. CL Medical SARL et al
as 2:2016cv00221
Plaintiff:
Janice Gregory
Defendant:
CL Medical SARL, CL Medical Inc. and Uroplasty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gross v. CL Medical SARL et al
as 9:2015cv81693
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gross
Defendant:
CL Medical SARL , CL Medical, Inc. and Cogentix Medical, Inc. formally known as Uroplasty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. CL Medical Sarl et al
as 2:2015cv02075
Plaintiff:
Dell B Johnson
Defendant:
CL Medical Sarl, CL Medical Inc and Uroplasty Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerk v. CL MEDICAL SARL et al
as 1:2015cv01145
Plaintiff:
Alberta Lee Gerk
Defendant:
CL MEDICAL SARL, CL Medical, Inc. and UROPLASTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lembert-Melendez et al v. CL Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv62676
Plaintiff:
Iluminada Lembert-Melendez and Angelo Melendez
Defendant:
ABC Corps 1-10 and Uroplasty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mary Gaunce et al v. CL Medical Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Mary Gaunce and Daniel Gaunce
Defendant:
CL Medical Inc , Uroplasty Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Halton v. CL Medical Sarl et al
as 2:2014cv00108
Plaintiff:
Hilma Halton
Defendant:
CL Medical Sarl, CL Medical Inc. and Uroplasty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill et al v. CL Medical Sarl et al
as 2:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Deborah Gill and Samuel Gill
Defendant:
CL Medical Sarl, CL Medical Inc. and Uroplasty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnoult et al v. CL Medical Sarl et al
as 1:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
Holly Arnoult and Chris Arnoult
Defendant:
CL Medical Sarl, CL Medical Inc. and Uroplasty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huntley v. CL Medical Sarl et al
as 2:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Huntley
Defendant:
CL Medical Sarl , CL Medical Inc. , Uroplasty, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
