Cases 1 - 10 of 72
(PC) Walker v. Secretary of Corrections, et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
M. Cole, Secretary of Corrections, E. Takehara and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at00892
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Walker v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv02243
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Defendant:
J. Medina, California Department of Corrections, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goldstein v. Vasudevan et al
as 5:2016cv02238
Plaintiff:
Arthur Goldstein
Defendant:
Suresh Vasudevan, Anup V. Singh, Frank Calderoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwartz v. Vasudevan et al
as 5:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Schwartz
Defendant:
Suresh Vasudevan, Varun Mehta, Frank Calderoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Madhani v. Nimble Storage, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00629
Plaintiff:
Shams Madhani
Defendant:
Nimble Storage, Inc. , Suresh Vasudevan and Anup V. Singh
Movant:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Guardino v. Nimble Storage, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05991
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Guardino
Defendant:
Nimble Storage, Inc., Suresh Vasudevan and Anup V. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Desai Vikramkumar v. Nimble Storage, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05803
Plaintiff:
Desai Kushal Vikramkumar
Defendant:
Nimble Storage, Inc., Suresh Vasudevan and Anup V. Singh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Heilman v. Whitten, et al
as 2:2015cv01585
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman
Defendant:
A. Whitten, A. Gonzales, M. Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chinsami v. Singh, et al.
as 2:2014cv00461
Plaintiff:
Shu Chinsami
Defendant:
V. Singh, Silbaugh and Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
