Cases 1 - 10 of 65
KERSAINT v. VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
as 7:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
JORDAN KERSAINT
Defendant:
VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scriven v. Odum et al
as 1:2025cv00086
Petitioner:
Antwone Scriven
Respondent:
Roy Odum and Valdosta State Prison
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scriven v. Odum et al
as 1:2025cv01940
Petitioner:
Antwone Scriven
Respondent:
Roy Odum and Valdosta State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kersaint v. Valdosta State Prison
as 1:2025cv01925
Plaintiff:
Jordan Kersaint
Defendant:
Valdosta State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERSAINT v. VALDOSTA STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
JORDAN KERSAINT
Defendant:
VALDOSTA STATE PRISON and VALDOSTA GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
DAVIDSON v. BRYANT et al
as 7:2025cv00022
Plaintiff:
GERALD DAVIDSON
Defendant:
MS FNU BRYANT, A JONES, VALDOSTA STATE PRISON BOOKKEEPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABDULLAH v. PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Defendant:
PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, VALDOSTA STATE PRISON and DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK TAKEEYBA ABDULLAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO PETERSON
Defendant:
WARDEN VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEAL v. VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
as 7:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
TAMAJ NEAL
Defendant:
VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
