Cases 1 - 10 of 326
VAN HORN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01356
Petitioner:
THOMAS VAN HORN, JR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Van Horne v. Haag
as 24-10492
Defendant:
Taylor County Court at Law No. 2, Brandy Maldonado, Brandi Deremer and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Van Horne and Steve Van Horne
Van Horne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02811
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Van Horne
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv02080
Defendant:
THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
VAN HORN
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Defendant:
THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BIRCHINGTON, LLC et al v. SSHCOF II WASHINGTON DC, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
BIRCHINGTON, LLC and HABTE SEQUAR
Defendant:
SSHCOF II WASHINGTON DC, LLC, PEACHTREE GROUP d/b/a PEACHTREE HOTEL GROUP II, LLC, JAMES VAN HORN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Van Horne v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Steve Van Horne
Defendant:
Judge Sparky Dean, Emily Sterling, Randi Hyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Horne v. Haag et al
as 1:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Steve Van Horne
Defendant:
Harriett L Haag, Brandi Deremer, Brandy Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
