Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Maxwell Hoffman v. David Haas, et al
as 13-35428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAXWELL HOFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID HAAS, Medical Services Manager, Idaho Department of Correction, JOHN HARDISON, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution, VAUGHN KILLEEN, Director, Idaho Department of Correction and others
Payne et al v. Sandy et al
as 4:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Albert Payne and Shirley Noble
Defendant:
Robyn Sandy, Caroline Meline, Jay L Nielson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abdullah Al-Kidd v. Killeen, et al
as 08-35692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDULLAH AL-KIDD
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, JOHN ASHCROFT, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VAUGHN KILLEEN
King v. Fourth Judicial District, Ada County et al
as 1:2008cv00033
Petitioner:
Cody Ray King
Respondent:
Fourth Judicial District, Ada County, Vaughn Killeen, Alan Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Colson et al
as 1:2007cv00387
Petitioner:
Cody Ray King
Respondent:
Jerry Colson, Fourth Judicial District Ada County, Idaho, Vaughn Killeen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skanda v. Reinke et al
as 1:2007cv00271
Plaintiff:
SankaraNandi S Skanda
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Vaughn Killeen, Thomas Beauclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy et al v. BeauClair et al
as 4:2007cv00042
Plaintiff:
Alisha Ann Murphy, Carla Jacobsen, Esther Miller and others
Defendant:
Tom BeauClair, Vaughn Killeen, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Kidd, et al v. Gonzales, et al
as 06-36059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ABDULLAH AL-KIDD
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General and JOHN ASHCROFT
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, DENNIS CALLAHAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
