Cases 1 - 10 of 1,315
Larry Patterson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7135
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
LARRY EDWIN PATTERSON
Crosby v. Turner et al
as 7:2024cv00845
Defendant:
K. Sykes, Ramey, M. Trent and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7132
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Joseph Merlino, III v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6958
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
JOSEPH VINCENT MERLINO, III
Mays v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00814
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Doctor H. Smith, Mrs. T. Townsend and others
Plaintiff:
Lachristopher Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01729
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Virginia Department Of Corrections, Beth Cabell and others
Plaintiff:
Tommie Matthias Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinten Parrish v. Harold Clarke
as 24-7097
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir. of Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
QUINTEN D. PARRISH
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Lt. Barton, D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaz Earp v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6932
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
CHAZ ANTONIO EARP
Collins v. Portsmouth Circuit Court et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Defendant:
Portsmouth Circuit Court and Virginia Department Of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Donta Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
