Cases 1 - 10 of 744
Calloway v. Youssee, et al.
as 25-2317
Plaintiff:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant:
A. YOUSSEE, Chief Medical Executive at Wasco State Prison, S. DAVENPORT, Chief Medical Executive at Kern Valley State Prison, S. LOPEZ, Chief Medical Officer at Kern Valley State Prison and others
Sharrod Moten v. Alafa
as 2:2025cv03165
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
DR. MOERKE, DR. KEHINDE, DR. BRAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Bird
as 25-1617
Petitioner:
LESTER KENJI RILEY
Respondent:
LANDON BIRD, Warden, Valley State Prison
Roberts v. Salinas Valley State Prison
as 3:2025cv02422
Plaintiff:
David Roberts
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Broadnax v. State Controller's Office (CA), et al.
as 1:2025cv00285
Plaintiff:
Cottrell L. Broadnax
Defendant:
State Controller's Office (CA), CDCR, Office of Appeals (OOA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadnax v. Newsom, et al.
as 1:2025cv00276
Plaintiff:
Cottrell L. Broadnax
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Kathleen Allison, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaze v. Warden, Valley State Prison
as 25-1280
Petitioner:
ISAIAH T. GLAZE
Respondent:
WARDEN, VALLEY STATE PRISON
Betts v. Godwin, et al.
as 25-1114
Petitioner:
MATTHEW ROLAND BETTS
Respondent:
RON GODWIN, Warden at Pleasant Valley State Prison at Coalinga and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Saavedra v. Godwin
as 25-933
Petitioner:
DANIEL SAAVEDRA
Respondent:
RON GODWIN, Acting Warden, Pleasant Valley State Prison
(PC) Moten v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 1:2025cv00188
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Tammy Falconer, Jeff Macombers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
