Cases 21 - 30 of 749
Zachary Barker Coughlin v. Warden Valley State Prison
as 2:2025cv00537
Petitioner:
Zachary Barker Coughlin
Respondent:
Warden Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Randle v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2025cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
S. Vera, Kern Valley State Prison and P. Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
as 3:2024cv02443
Defendant:
Kern Valley State Prison, S. Vera and P. Horn
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hidalgo, et al.
as 24-7633
Plaintiff:
RAYON JONES
Defendant:
HIDALGO, Mr.; First Name Unknown, Sergeant at Salinas Valley State Prison, C. VEGA, Sergeant at Salinas Valley State Prison, CHARLES SCHUYLER, Warden and others
Adonai El Shaddai Wilkerson v. Salinas Valley State Prison
as 2:2024cv10918
Petitioner:
Adonai El Shaddai Wilkerson
Respondent:
Salinas Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Salinas Valley State Prison (SVSP)
as 24-7391
Petitioner:
HAWTHORNE MCGEE
Respondent:
SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON (SVSP)
Brookins v. Martinez, et al.
as 24-7150
Defendant:
KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, C. PFEIFFER, Warden and L. MARTINEZ, Sergeant
Plaintiff:
BARRY L. BROOKINS
Ainsworth v. Macomber, et al.
as 24-7011
Defendant:
JEFF MACOMBER, CDCR Secretary, CHAVEZ, C.O., RJ Donovan, TRENT HILL, Salinas Valley State Prison, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
TYRELL AINSWORTH
Sharrod Moten v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 2:2024cv09419
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Jeff Macombers, Tammy Falconer and others
Plaintiff:
Sharrod Moten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruth v. Warden, Valley State Prison
as 24-6481
Defendant:
WARDEN, VALLEY STATE PRISON
Plaintiff:
EBER G RUTH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
