Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Alvarez v. BrandSafway LLC
as 4:2022cv04337
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Alvarez
Defendant:
BrandSafway LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. USA, et al
as 22-15790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
United States of America, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Superior Court of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lois Alvarez-Espinal v. William Barr, U.S. Atty Gen
as 20-61039
Petitioner:
Lois Vanessa Alvarez-Espinal
Respondent:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
