Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Russell v. Scott
as 24-3312
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF THE VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
JASON SCOTT
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RUSSELL
Kishinevski v. Deml et al
as 2:2024cv01440
Defendant:
Nicholas J Deml, Colin Seaman, Effective Counseling Solutions LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anatoly Kishinevski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00962
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Buswell v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Nicholas Deml, C.O. Juels, Greg Hale and others
Plaintiff:
Malachi A. Buswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabriel v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Timothy Michael Gabriel
Defendant:
Vermont Department of Corrections, Chandler Corbett, Brandon Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Carpenter
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections, Amy Jacobs, Nick Deml and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kishinevski v. Deml et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Anatoly Kishinevski
Defendant:
Nicholas J Deml, Jeff Percy, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Neill v. Deml
as 23-620
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robin O'Neill
Respondent / Appellee:
Nicholas Deml, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Corrections
Barrette v. Swanton Village Trustees et al
as 2:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Deven Barrette
Defendant:
Swanton Village Trustees, Vermont Department of Corrections, Howard Center, Inc. doing business as Howard Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rheaume v. Baker
as 22-6205
Petitioner:
ALLEN RHEAUME
Respondent:
JAMES BAKER, COMMISSIONER OF THE VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
