Cases 1 - 10 of 20
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Christian Bartholomew Switch, Herbert Joe White, Nancy Gay White Mann and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
White v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00821
Plaintiff:
Victor D White
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01750
Petitioner:
Victor Erwin White
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
White v. Nooth
as 2:2012cv00871
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Victor Akeem White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. USA - 2255
as 1:2011cv02801
Petitioner:
Victor E. White
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Victor White v. Charleston Correctional Center
as 11-2581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor L. White
Defendant - Appellee:
Charleston Correctional Center
Victor White v. John Price
as 11-2562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor L. White
Defendant - Appellee:
John E. Price, Attorney
White v. Price
as 4:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
Victor Louis White
Defendant:
John E. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. South East Correctional Center
as 4:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Victor Louis White
Defendant:
South East Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor White v. FNU Smereka
as 10-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR B. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU SMEREKA, FNU TAYLOR, CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
FNU SERGEANT, FNU SMITH, FNU PAULK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
