Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Mason v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC
as 4:2022cv03454
Plaintiff:
Todd Victor Mason
Defendant:
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Hinds County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2020cv00782
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Detention Facility and Victor Mason
Plaintiff:
Darile Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv06224
Defendant:
Jessica, Doe, Trina and others
Plaintiff:
Verick Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2019cv00920
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Victor Mason, Richard Fielder, Mary Rushing and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Deangelo Stevenson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hinds County et al
as 3:2019cv00761
Defendant:
M.W 5530 Mike Worten, AB 3167 Andrew Baldwin, Sheriff Victor Mason and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Allen Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Mason
as 3:2019cv00687
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Donald Edwards
Defendant:
Victor Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Proctor v. Mason
as 3:2019cv00688
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
Victor Mason
Petitioner:
Cordaron Proctor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kendrick Bell v. Victor Mason, et al
as 19-60779
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN MURPHY, Road Deputy, HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, MARY RUSHING, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENDRICK MARQUES BELL
Clayton v. Mason
as 3:2019cv00629
Plaintiff:
Chester Clayton
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Mason
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burns v. Mason
as 3:2019cv00630
Respondent:
Victor Mason
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Terrence Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
