Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
AMAZON.COM, INC. et al v. VJ UNIACCENT LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
VJ UNIACCENT LLC, VIJAY KUMAR and DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. JAI SHRI RAM HOSPITALITY GROUP OF CHICO, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
JAI SHRI RAM HOSPITALITY GROUP OF CHICO, LLC, VINOD SHARMA, RAJMNDER SHARMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kumar v. Garland
as 22-60128
Petitioner:
Vijay Kumar
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Qualinfotech Solutions, Inc. et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al
as 4:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Qualinfotech Solutions, Inc. and Vijay Kumar Appana
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kirt Thompson, Tracy Renaud and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
