Cases
ASCENSION ST. VINCENT RANDOLPH v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00671
Plaintiff: ASCENSION ST. VINCENT RANDOLPH
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Boykin et al v. Wells Fargo Financial Texas, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv02663
Plaintiff: Cecil Boykin
Defendant: Wells Fargo Financial Texas, Inc., Chuck Martin, Mike Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Vincent Randolph Hospital, v. Sylvia Burwell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant: ST. VINCENT RANDOLPH HOSPITAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
ST. VINCENT RANDOLPH HOSPITAL, INC. v. BURWELL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00768
Defendant: SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Interested Party: Loretta E Lynch and Josh Minkler
Plaintiff: ST. VINCENT RANDOLPH HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
THOMAS, MD v. INDIANA PHYSICIAN MANAGEMENT LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00640
Defendant: JOSHUA GEESY, INDIANA PHYSICIAN MANAGEMENT LLC and ST. VINCENT RANDOLPH HOSPITAL INC.
Plaintiff: JAMES THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00901
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Vincent Adolph, Jr. v. Maggie Miller-Stout
as 08-36060
Petitioner - Appellant: VINCENT RANDOLPH ADOLPH, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT
Adolph v. Miller-Stout
as 2:2008cv00209
Petitioner: Vincent Randolph Adolph, Jr.
Respondent: Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?