Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Strege v. Charles Schwab et al
as 3:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Charles Schwab, Uranium One, Energy Fuels and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Staffactory, LLC v. Visa Solutions Healthcare, LLC
as 4:2023cv04796
Plaintiff:
Staffactory, LLC
Defendant:
Visa Solutions Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Liberty Peak Ventures, LLC v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Liberty Peak Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Visa Inc. and Visa U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cortex MCP, Inc. v. Visa, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Cortex MCP, Inc.
Defendant:
Visa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
RFCyber Corp. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.
as 6:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
RFCyber Corp.
Defendant:
Visa U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2021cv02234
Plaintiff:
Cesar C. Gonzlez and Cesar C Gonzalez
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank doing business as American Eagle Outfitters Visa Card, Credit Corp Solutions, Inc. and Credit Corp Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
