Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Withers v. Visteon Corporation
as 2:2010cv13085
Plaintiff:
Cherisse Withers
Defendant:
Visteon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
v. Visteon Corporation
as 2:2010cv13054
Defendant:
Visteon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00614
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00570
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00091
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Aaron v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2009cv02549
Defendant:
Visteon Corporation, Noble Grohe, Lacoya Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Marla J. Aaron
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00552
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Denise Lance, et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 09-1685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENISE LANCE, on behalf of herself and a class of all other similarly situated individuals and MICHAEL RIVIERA, on behalf of himself and a class of all other similarly situated individuals
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and VISTEON CORPORATION
SHEDLOCK v. VISTEON CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SHEDLOCK
Defendant:
VISTEON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
