Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Baldwin et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv03208
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc. and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Connie Shahan and Darryl W. Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
GREENWADE v. BALDWIN
as 2:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
DION GREENWADE
Defendant:
MARTIN W. BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Baldwin et al v. Harper et al
as 1:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Keith Harper, Kilpatrick Townsent and Stockton LLP and Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Baldwin, Kelly A Rudd, Baldwin Crocker & Rudd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Santa Barbara Cty. Chapter, Natl Elec. Contractors Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00091
Defendant:
A. F. Duncan, Don Heumphreus, Frank Martin and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Baldwin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01285
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michail W. Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
David Baldwin, II v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-2785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. BALDWIN, II
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pinto v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00070
Defendant:
United States of America , Ernest E. Baldwin, Renea W. Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Pinto
Cause Of Action: Actions affecting property on which United States had lien
United States of America v. Baldwin
as 5:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John W. Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
