Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Carlos Barrios v. W. Sullivan, et al
as 22-55231
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS V. BARRIOS
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden and XAVIER BECERRA
De Shun Bowers v. W. Sullivan
as 21-55822
Petitioner / Appellant:
DE SHUN BOWERS
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden
De Shun Bowers v. USDC-CALA
as 21-70364
Not Classified By Court:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden and In re: DE SHUN BOWERS
Petitioner:
DE SHUN BOWERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Relmon Davis, III v. W. Sullivan
as 20-17375
Petitioner / Appellant:
RELMON H. DAVIS III
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden
De Shun Bowers v. USDC-CALA
as 20-73244
Not Classified By Court:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden and In re: DE SHUN BOWERS
Petitioner:
DE SHUN BOWERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Moses Turner v. W. Sullivan
as 17-55724
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOSES LEE TURNER
Respondent - Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden of the California Correctional Institution, Tehachapi, California
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-56258
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-55820
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Jeremiah Birchett v. W. Sullivan
as 12-16122
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMIAH BIRCHETT
Respondent - Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden
Jaime Zepeda v. W. Sullivan, et al
as 12-15732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME LEDESMA ZEPEDA
Defendant - Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden, M. CARRASCO, Ass. Warden Units IVA and IVB, L. L. SCHULTEIS, C.D. Warden IVB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
