Cases 1 - 10 of 1,164
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Smith v. King
as 1:2025cv00196
Petitioner:
Dorr W. Smith
Defendant:
Michelle A. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Hunter
as 25-1388
Claimant:
CHARLES W. SMITH
Respondent:
TODD HUNTER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Allen v. Smith et al
as 4:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
Andre Allen
Defendant:
Keith W Smith, Brown and Heather Edward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPECIALTY OIL SERVICES, INC. v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2025cv00424
Defendant:
RENEGADE NATION, INC., CHARLIE RENEGADE, STESSA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
SPECIALTY OIL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morag Polaski v. Josh Stein
as 25-1038
Defendant:
JOSH STEIN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina, ASHLIE SHANLEY, in her official capacity as District Attorney for the 25th Prosecutorial District of the State of North Carolina, A. TODD BROWN, in his official capacity as President of the North Carolina State Bar and Chair of the Executive Committee of the North Carolina State Bar and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWANA ALMENDAREZ, MORAG BLACK POLASKI and NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE FOR ALL PROJECT
Smith v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2025at00026
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Plaintiff:
Chadwick W Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.