Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Giddens v. The Lehman Brothers Inc. Defer
as 20-3757
Respondent / Appellee:
The Lehman Brothers Inc. Deferred Compensation Defense Steering Committee, As Attorney In Fact For Those Specified Herein
Petitioner / Appellant:
James W. Giddens, as Trustee for the SIPA Liquidation of Lehman Brothers Inc.,
The Lehman Brothers Inc. Defer v. Giddens
as 20-2358
Respondent:
The Lehman Brothers Inc. Deferred Compensation Defense Steering Committee as Attorney in Fact for those Specified,
Petitioner:
James W. Giddens
In Re: Lehman Brothers Inc.
as 19-3245
Appellee:
James W. Giddens, as Trustee for the SIPA Liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc.
Appellant:
344 Individuals, Identified in the Notices of Appearances at Bankruptcy Court ECF Dkt. Nos. 8234, 8905 & 9459
Debtor:
Lehman Brothers Inc. and In re: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06246
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03785
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03762
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3666
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2788
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2737
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giddens v. Herrschaft
as 2:2016cv14116
Plaintiff:
Ernest W Giddens
Defendant:
George A Herrschaft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
