Cases 1 - 10 of 214
Carlos Barrios v. W. Sullivan, et al
as 22-55231
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS V. BARRIOS
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden and XAVIER BECERRA
De Shun Bowers v. W. Sullivan
as 21-55822
Petitioner / Appellant:
DE SHUN BOWERS
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden
(PC) Bibbs v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2021cv01145
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
W. J. Sullivan, Gonzalez, Tyree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Bibbs v. W.J. Sullivan et al
as 2:2021cv06009
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
W. J. Sullivan, Gonzalez, Tyree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Bibbs v. W. Sullivan
as 21-55779
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN J. BIBBS
Respondent / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN
Martin J. Bibbs v. W. J. Sullivan
as 2:2021cv05398
Petitioner:
Martin Bibbs and Martin J. Bibbs
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guillermo Trujillo v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 21-16077
Defendant / Appellee:
S. BALLESTORO, C/O at KVSP, W. J. SULLIVAN, Chief Deputy- Warden, C. PFEIFFER, Chief Deputy- Warden at KVSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO, AKA Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Samaniego v. California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021at00481
Defendant:
Warden W. J. Sullivan, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Christian Warden Pfeffer
Plaintiff:
Ivan Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guillermo Trujillo v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 21-15895
Defendant / Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Chief Deputy Warden at KVSP, T. S. ARLITZ, Associate Warden at KVSP, C. PFEIFFER, Chief Deputy Warden at KVSP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO, AKA Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
(PC) Samaniego v. CDCR et al
as 1:2021cv00839
Defendant:
F. Zavaleta, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, W. J. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
