Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Carlos Sandoval v. W. Montgomery
as 23-55496
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS SANDOVAL
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
David Ortega v. W. Montgomery
as 23-55322
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID STEVEN ORTEGA
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
Michael Rhinehart v. W. Montgomery, et al
as 23-55250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RHINEHART
Defendant / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, Warden, J. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer and ARVIZU, Correctional Officer
Page v. Montgomery
as 3:2022cv01664
Plaintiff:
Michael Page
Defendant:
W. L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Molina v. W. Montgomery
as 22-55958
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO MOLINA
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
(PC) Brass v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2022cv01466
Petitioner:
Gary Brass, Jr.
Respondent:
W. L. Montgomery, Mario De La Torre, Favela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Brass v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Gary Brass, Jr.
Defendant:
W. L. Montgomery, Mario De La Torre, Favela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo Garcia v. W.L. Montgomery
as 2:2022cv06737
Petitioner:
Ricardo Garcia
Respondent:
W. L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marlon Blacher v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON BLACHER, AKA Marlon Jessie Blacher
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, ALL CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFFING PERSONS and others
Charles Allen v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55712
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, MARTINEZ, Food Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
