Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Milhouse v. Heath et al
as 1:2015cv01400
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
Suzanne Heath, James Fosnot, David Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. United States et al
as 1:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Jones
Defendant:
United States, BOP Agency, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kareem Milhouse v. Terry O'Brien
as 15-6387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM MILHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN, Warden, FANNING, Psychologist (Chief), GREGORY MIMS, Clintical and Medical Director and others
Milhouse v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, Fanning and W. Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ODOM et al v. JASPER COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
HENRY W ODOM and JUSTIN BOSTWICK
Defendant:
JASPER COUNTY GEORGIA, CHARLES ROPER, DONNIE POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01299
Plaintiff:
Randall W. Odom
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odom v. International Paper Co
as 3:2012cv00609
Defendant:
International Paper Co
Plaintiff:
Donald W Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odom v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 9:2011cv81350
Plaintiff:
Randall W. Odom
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odom v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Odom
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ODOM v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63965
Plaintiff:
HARRY W. ODOM, SR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. , AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC. , THE BUDD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
