Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Anduze v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01665
Defendant:
Dychese, Drumwright, Tiffany Morales and others
Plaintiff:
Jahmanni Anduze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anduze v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Defendant:
Capt. Loiseau, Captain Bernard Mathis, CO Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Johmanni Anduze
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
ADW Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Muldowney
as 3:2020cv00383
Plaintiff:
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick Muldowney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Rigsby et al
as 9:2020cv00224
Plaintiff:
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Woods, Frank Rigsby, Tommie Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Rodriguez v. Virginia Penrod
as 20-5089
Respondent / Appellee:
Virginia S. Penrod, Chief of Staff for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, United States Department of Defense
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert W. Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2020cv01538
Plaintiff:
Dax W. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America and Greater New York Councils, Boy Scouts of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Muldowney et al
as 9:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommie Haynes, Center Control Picket Officers, Kerri Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Muldowney
as 9:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
Frank W Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick Muldowney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. PENROD
as 1:2018cv00240
Petitioner:
ROBERT W. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
VIRGINIA S. PENROD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Rodriguez v. La Lechonera Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv20286
Plaintiff:
Asnolys W. Rodriguez
Defendant:
La Lechonera Products, Inc. , Luis Mejuto and Luis Mejuto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
