Cases 1 - 10 of 339
SPRIGGS et al v. THE BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. et al
as 2:2010cv68757
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. SPRIGGS and CAROL SPRIGGS
Defendant:
THE BABCOCK & WILCOX CO., COMBUSTION ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., THE FLINTKOTE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
ANDREWS v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90211
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANDREWS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCGLADE v. A.C.AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90152
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR J. MCGLADE
Defendant:
A.C.AND S., INC., A.C.AND S., INC., A.C.AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LEVANOWSKI v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90045
Plaintiff:
JEROME LEVANOWSKI
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, AIRCO INC./THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2008cv90185
Defendant:
JOHN J NICHOLS, A. C. AND S., INC., A. C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HALL v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90047
Plaintiff:
LLOYD D. HALL
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., AIRCO, INC., BOC GROUP, THE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BAILEY v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90153
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL F BAILEY
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., AIRCO INC./THE BOC GROUP, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ORLANDO v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90071
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. ORLANDO and JAMES R. ORLANDO
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BEAVERS v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv90177
Plaintiff:
JAMES BEAVERS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC., A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ANDRADE v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2008cv89849
Plaintiff:
MANUEL J. ANDRADE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
