Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Marcie Le, et al v. Walgreen Co, et al
as 20-55743
Defendant / Appellee: WALGREEN CO, an Illinois corporation, WALGREEN PHARMACY SERVICES MIDWEST, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: KAREN DAO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARCIE LE
Marcie Le, et al v. Walgreen Co, et al
as 20-80101
Respondent: WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC., a Delaware corporation, WALGREEN CO, an Illinois corporation, WALGREEN PHARMACY SERVICES MIDWEST, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company
Petitioner: MARCIE LE, KAREN DAO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
B.P., et al v. Ramesh Balwani, et al
as 20-15974
Plaintiff / Appellee: S.L., B.P., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, R.G. and others
Defendant / Appellant: RAMESH BALWANI
Defendant: WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC., WALGREENS ARIZONA DRUG COMPANY
B.P., et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., et al
as 20-15976
Plaintiff / Appellee: S.L., B.P., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, R.G. and others
Defendant: RAMESH BALWANI
Defendant / Appellant: WALGREENS ARIZONA DRUG COMPANY, WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC.
B.P., et al v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., et al
as 20-80058
Respondent: R.G., S.J., A.R. and others
Petitioner: WALGREENS ARIZONA DRUG COMPANY, WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC.
United Food & Commercial Work., et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al
as 17-80035
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO and others
United Food & Commercial Work, et al v. Actavis, Inc., et al
as 17-80034
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ACTAVIS, INC., ACTAVIS PLC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 16-72817
: In re: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO
Petitioner: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al v. Xavier Becerra We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15873
Plaintiff - Appellee: ITALIAN COLORS RESTAURANT, a California Business Entity, ALAN CARLSON, Owner, Italian Colors Restaurant, LAURELWOOD CLEANERS, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, DBA Laurelwood Cleaners and Laundry, DBA Milo's Cleaners and Laundry and others
Defendant - Appellant: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, State of California, XAVIER BECERRA, Attorney General, State of California
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL APARTMENT ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA GROCERS ASSOCIATION, SAFEWAY INC., THE KROGER CO., WALGREEN CO., ALBERTSONS LLC, HY-VEE, INC., and RITE AID CORPORATION, CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC.
Randy Boysen v. Walgreen Co.
as 12-17025
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDY BOYSEN, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: WALGREEN CO., an Illinois corporation, DBA Walgreens

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?