Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
EIDMANN v. WALGREEN CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv04805
Defendant: WALGREEN CO.
Plaintiff: CAMERON EIDMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Lakeport et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04007
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California, acting by and through the City of Lakeport, City of Lakeport and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Walgreen Co. et al v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv07843
Defendant: Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: The Kroger Co., H-E-B LP, Walgreen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re Glumetza Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv05822
Defendant: Lupin Ltd., Bausch Health Companies Inc., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., Rite Aid Corporation, Hy-Vee, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK Holdings, LLC v. Bausch Health Companies Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv05426
Defendant: Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Bausch Health Companies Inc., LUPIN LTD and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC
Petitioner: City of Providence, H-E-B LP, Albertsons Companies Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tule River Indian Tribe of California v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03222
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
County of Del Norte v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02732
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: County of Del Norte
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?