Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Vickers v. Dong et al
as 1:2015cv02469
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Craig E. Dong, J. J. Tumlin, Anthoney J. Polizzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Mend Correctional Care et al
as 0:2015cv02848
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel W Moore
Defendant:
MEND Correctional Care, PA Longenfeld, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNSON v. THE WALGREEN DRUG STORE CHAIN CORP IN PHILA et al
as 2:2014cv06736
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
THE WALGREEN DRUG STORE CHAIN CORP IN PHILA, THE WALGREENS ON BROAD & SNYDER, THE WALGREENS ON 9TH MARKET STREET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Anderson et al
as 8:2014cv01448
Plaintiff:
Allen Drexel Lucas
Defendant:
M. Tyler Anderson, Ashley McMillan and Walgreens Drug Store #3093
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brakes v. Walgreen Corporate
as 1:2014cv04109
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Brakes
Defendant:
Walgreen Corporate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Walgreens et al
as 1:2014cv03207
Plaintiff:
John V. Norris
Defendant:
Walgreens, Jose Reyes, Andrew Armitage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Cooper, et al
as 13-7080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAN LEE SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BARLOW, Unit Manager, LT. ROBERTS, Correctional Counselor, LEWIS, Correctional Counselor and others
Craft v. Olden, et al
as 13-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS DOUGLAS CRAFT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRA OLDEN, CASEY YANDELL/FORAN, Case Manager and KATE WALGREEN, Correctional Officer
Edward Newsome v. Ken McGee, et al
as 12-50946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ROY NEWSOME
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN MCGEE, Walgreen Drugstore Manager and WILLIE COLEMAN, JR., Attorney at Law
Scott v. Cooper et al
as 6:2012cv00076
Plaintiff:
Shan Lee Scott
Defendant:
Cooper, William Barlow, Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
