Cases 1 - 10 of 384
HILL v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, Natasha Barkley, Mike Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MCNEIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18580
Plaintiff:
WALTER MCNEIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAGRANE v. MCNEIL
as 4:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAGRANE
Respondent:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARVEY v. MCNEIL
as 4:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
DARREL HARVEY
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOKS v. LEON COUNTY et al
as 4:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
TAREYAN COOKS, ANDIZA JOEL COOKS and CHARLES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LEON COUNTY, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, WALTER MCNEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MCNEIL
as 4:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
ANTONIO T MARTIN
Respondent:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NORRIS v. MCNEIL
as 4:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Norris
Defendant:
Walter McNeil
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Bush et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11964
Plaintiff:
Susan Lori Magazine, Christina Martinez, Noah R McCloskey and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
MCNEIL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53298
Plaintiff:
WALTER MCNEIL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. LEON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2021cv00111
Defendant:
ALL CORN, TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BROWN, ARAZIA OLIVER, RANYAH FARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
