Cases 1 - 10 of 235
COTTON v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2025cv00487
Plaintiff:
DAVID COTTON, JR
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUKES v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 5:2025cv00096
Plaintiff:
ALICIA ANN DUKES
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KNOWLTON v. WALTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
as 3:2025cv00124
Plaintiff:
REECE KNOWLTON
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
LOVELACE v. WALTON COUNTY et al
as 3:2025cv00023
Plaintiff:
CALVIN LOVELACE
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY and OFFICER PALMER JACOB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUDSON v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2025cv00017
Plaintiff:
MACARIO HUDSON
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL and DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Mitchell v. Iowa Dept. of Health and Human Services, et al
as 25-1220
Plaintiff:
John N. Mitchell
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Health and Human Services, Scott County District Court, Julie Erickson, also known as Julie Spears and others
Walker v. Grant Street Group et al
as 1:2025cv00761
Plaintiff:
Doris V Walker
Defendant:
Grant Street Group doing business as Grant Street Group, Bay County Tax Department, Brevard County Tax Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
BARROW v. WALTON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2025cv00004
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
TAVIS BARROW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
