Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BRADFORD v. SALES et al
as 5:2025cv00023
Plaintiff:
AVERY BRADFORD
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, DEPUTY WARDEN DESIRE JONES, OFFICIAL TYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRONG v. SALES et al
as 5:2024cv00349
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, DR J ANDREWS and PAM MAXEY
Plaintiff:
AARON EDWARD STRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADFORD v. SALES
as 5:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
AVERY BRADFORD
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00257
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, Counselor williams, SERGEANT RONNESHA TULLIS and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN BROWN and DARLENE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00181
Respondent:
Warden TIMOTHY SALES and TYRONE OLIVER
Petitioner:
MARCUS MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Sales
as 1:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
William Burke
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURKE v. SALES
as 5:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BURKE
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00337
Plaintiff:
DAIJUAN TAIKAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, REGIONAL MANAGER SIKES and WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. SALES et al
as 5:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
MARION BERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURDEN v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
DALVIN M BURDEN
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and SERGEANT KENDRICK BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
