Cases 1 - 10 of 2,712
Chadwick v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Daniel Chadwick
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS and WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. Chambers
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
John William Martin
Respondent:
Warden Brian Chambers
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Upton
as 1:2024cv01608
Petitioner:
Jonathan Hill
Respondent:
Warden Steve Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson v. Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
William R. Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lenz
Defendant:
Warden Deshawn Jones, Deputy Warden Polite and Lt Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Wheeler Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mark Bradley Boyd
Respondent:
Warden Wheeler Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez-Cuan v. Warden Thomas
as 1:2024cv01501
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Alvarez-Cuan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
