Cases 1 - 10 of 523
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Violett v. Grise et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Violett
Respondent:
Judge John R. Grise and Warden Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNichols v. Hatton et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Captain Zackary Eubanks, Warden Bobbi Jo Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triana-Ceballos v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Triana-Ceballos
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Crandall James
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baker v. Green
as 0:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker
Defendant:
Warden Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
