Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Singleton v. State of South Carolina Dept. of Corr.
as 2:2012cv02541
Petitioner:
Michael Singleton
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berry v. Warden
as 2:2012cv02058
Petitioner:
Kristopher Wilmont Berry
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rush v. State, The
as 4:2012cv00814
Petitioner:
David Lewis Rush
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2012cv00206
Petitioner:
Kevin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clifton Stallings v. Warden of Evans Correctional
as 11-7463
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFTON STALLINGS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
JON E. OZMINT, Director of SCDC
Quentin Anderson v. Warden of Evans Correctional
as 11-6252
Petitioner - Appellant:
QUENTIN ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Stallings v. Ozmint
as 2:2010cv02668
Petitioner:
Clifton Stallings
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curtis Richardson v. South Carolina Department of C
as 09-7916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, individual and official capacity, HIPP, Lieutenant, Individual and official capacity and others
Kenneth Stradley v. Warden, Evans Correctional
as 09-7866
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH ALAN STRADLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent - None:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
James Graham v. State of South Carolina
as 09-7664
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
