Cases 1 - 10 of 224
Murphy v. Powell
as 23-4118
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CHARLES MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ROBERT POWELL
Baker v. Shelly et al
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Mira Baker
Defendant:
Lieutenant Shelly, Warden Robert Mercado, R. Abassa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casson v. Currington et al
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Malcom Casson
Defendant:
Sgt. Currington, Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meades v. May
as 1:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Meades
Defendant:
Warden Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ramos
Defendant:
C/O Henry, Sgt. Edwards, Lt. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Dean et al.
as 1:2023cv01289
Plaintiff:
Terence A.W. Green, Jr.
Defendant:
The Warden Robert Dean, Correctional Officer Lt. Ukwu, Correctional Officer I. Ngu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Harry L. Samuel
Defendant:
Warden Robert May and Centurion LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tejada v. Renington et al
as 1:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Renington, Correctional Officer Jaelise Ballestas, Correctional Officer Brandon S. Joiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARD v. WARREN et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
TARRENCE JERMANE HEARD
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN CHARLES WARREN, EX. WARDEN ROBERT SMITH and EX. MEDICAL DIRECTOR KRISTINA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Hakiem Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
