Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Warren Ford v. Erick Smitherman, et al
as 23-11669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
ERICK SMITHERMAN, FREEMAN ELLISON, JEFFREY BROWN and others
Tamara Taylor, et al v. City and County of Honolulu, et al
as 23-15507
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAMARA TAYLOR, individually and on behalf of her minor child and N. B.
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTINE NEVES, in an individual capacity, COREY PEREZ, in an individual capacity and WARREN FORD, in an individual capacity
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, TERRI RUNGE, in an individual capacity and others
FORD v. MAY et al
as 5:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WARREN FORD
Defendant:
SCOTT MAY, A RALPH and A MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al v. City and County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tamara Taylor and N. B.
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii State Department of Education, C. Neves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. City of Clanton, Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
City of Clanton, Chilton County Sheriff's Department, Corry McCartney and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. LeBowitz et al
as 1:2018cv25144
Defendant:
Sgt. D. Shelby and Captain Phillip LeBowitz
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warren Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
Warren Ford
Defendant:
United States of America, John S. Davis, Janis C. Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren Ford v. Anthony Hayne
as 11-10386
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARREN FORD
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HAYNES, FCI Jesup, Jesup, GA, United States of America
Ford v. Haynes
as 2:2010cv00049
Petitioner:
Warren Ford
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
