Cases 41 - 50 of 4,643
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Pitcher et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv09813
Cross Defendant:
John Pitcher, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Pitcher
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Barretts Minerals Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Block Drug Company, FMC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 as Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Craig v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Redco Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Crooks v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv06089
Plaintiff:
David Crooks
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, AO Smith Corporation, ABB Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Cheek v. Admiral Valve, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv06666
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cheek
Defendant:
Admiral Valve, LLC, Air Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cheek v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv06630
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cheek
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BATES et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01441
Plaintiff:
WARREN BATES and MARY LYNN BATES
Cross Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BROOKWOOD VENTURES, L.P., BW/IP, INC. and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., ATWOOD & MORRILL CO., INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., FLOWSERVE U.S. INC., GENUINE PARTS COMPANY d/b/a National Automotive Parts Association, a/k/a/ NAPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gillis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant:
Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party:
Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
