Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Hayden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv06368
Defendant:
National Automotive Parts Association, Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Cleaver Brooks Inc and others
Cross Defendant:
Anco Insulations Inc, IMO Industries Inc, Ingersoll Rand Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Wyeth Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Hayden and Thomas H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hayden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv02275
Defendant:
National Automotive Parts Association, Avondale Industries, Inc., Chevron Oronite Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Hayden and Thomas H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Meyers et al v. Crane Company et al
as 2:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
Debra Dummitt Meyers and Ronald T. Palermo
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Aurora Pump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dowdle v. Avondale Industries Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01302
Defendant:
Maryland Casualty Company , Continental Insurance Company , Travelers Casualty and Surety Company and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Perez Dowdle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Najolia v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00821
Plaintiff:
Frank Najolia, Jr.
Defendant:
General Electric Company , CBS Corporation , Eagle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Atlas Refinery, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00199
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Anco Insulations, Inc., Atlas Refinery, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alton Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Eckerle v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05898
Defendant:
Riley Power, Inc., Sterling Fluid Systems, Inc., Hopeman Brothers Marine Interiors, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Najolia Eckerle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
