Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 336
William McDuffey et all v. American Laundry Machinery, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02491
Defendant: Warren Pumps, LLC, ITT, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff: William McDuffey and Teri McDuffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Christensen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv05255
Defendant: 3M Company, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff: David Emmett Christensen, Linda G. Christensen and Linda G Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Smargisso et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01414
Plaintiff: Stephanie Smargisso, William Ankiel Jr., William Ankiel, III and others
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, CLARK-RELIANCE CORPORATION, Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Keeling et al v. John Crane Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01066
Plaintiff: RONALD KEELING and Lois Keeling
Defendant: John Crane Inc., 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff: William Ollerton
Defendant: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant: DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee: ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant: CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff: Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cheek v. Admiral Valve, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv06666
Plaintiff: Sidney Cheek
Defendant: Admiral Valve, LLC, Air Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cheek v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv06630
Plaintiff: Sidney Cheek
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?