Cases 41 - 50 of 63
WOODS v WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC, et al
as 5:2020cv00144
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC. and WASTE PRO USA INC
Plaintiff:
JASON WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHAW v. WASTE PRO USA INC
as 4:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
TOSHIRIO F SHAW
Defendant:
WASTE PRO USA INC, SOUTH EAST PERSONNEL LEASING INC and PEOPLEREADY FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Blandon v. Waste Pro USA, Inc.
as 6:2019cv02420
Plaintiff:
Dodd Blandon
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WRIGHT v. WASTE PRO USA, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv62051
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC. and WASTE PRO USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WRIGHT, Randolph Mobley, Shawn Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Wright v. Waste Pro USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv62049
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. and Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Wright v. Waste Pro USA, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv62044
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. and Waste Pro USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Tweedie v. Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01827
Plaintiff:
Candiss Tweedie
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Florida, Inc. and Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Winslow et al v. Hudson et al
as 9:2018cv00426
Plaintiff:
Richard L Winslow and Charmayne Winslow
Defendant:
Matthew W Hudson, Waste Pro USA Inc , Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright et al v. Waste Pro USA Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02654
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wright , Daniel Hansen and Kenneth Privette
Defendant:
Waste Pro USA Inc, Waste Pro of Florida Inc, Waste Pro of South Carolina Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
