Cases 1 - 10 of 346
Bernardez et al v. United States Department of the Navy et al
as 1:2021cv11355
Plaintiff:
Nahum Bernardez and Derek Melvin
Defendant:
United States Department of the Navy, Waterman Steamship Corporation and Ocean Giant II Shipping Trust
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Minckler v. Waterman Steamship Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Seabulk Towing Services, Inc. and Waterman Steamship Corporation
Plaintiff:
James Minkler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mosley v. Intermarine, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13327
Defendant:
Intermarine, LLC and Waterman Steamship Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosley
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
McElveen v. Waterman Steamship Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv05846
Plaintiff:
Jack McElveen
Defendant:
Waterman Steamship Corporation , Unidentified Party, Standard Club and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205
Elkady v. Waterman Steamship Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv07589
Defendant:
Waterman Steamship Corporation and Maersk Line Limited
Plaintiff:
Tarek Elkady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Scheurer v. Waterman Steamship Corporation
as 1:2017cv04795
Plaintiff:
Alisia R Scheurer
Defendant:
Waterman Steamship Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Lenchanko v. Matson, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
James L. Lenchanko
Defendant:
Matson, Inc., Horizon Lines, LLC, Horizon Spirit, VIN 624457 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Lenchanko v. Matson Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00354
Plaintiff:
James Lenchanko
Defendant:
Matson Inc. and Waterman Steamship Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
v. Matson, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00353
Defendant:
Matson, Inc., Horizon Lines, LLC and Waterman Steamship Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
