Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04278
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04279
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04277
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04274
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04276
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Jones et al
as 3:2020cv00314
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Mitchell
Defendant:
David Voorchies, Vincent Knight and Marcus Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv01317
Respondent:
TDCID Parole Division
Petitioner:
Robert Wayne Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Atwood, II v. Ben Ford, et al
as 17-60257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY HOLBROOKE, Covington County Sheriff's Department, DETECTIVE PAMELA WADE SMITH, Covington County Sheriff's Department, DEPUTY ANGIE DIEHL, Covington County Sheriff's Department and others
Mitchell v. Baker
as 5:2017cv00157
Respondent:
Warden FNU Baker
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Harold Wayne Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
